Lab of One · Experiment
Asian Cup 2027 Model

Insights

Deep-run probability

TeamR16QFSFFinalTitle
JPN99.9%87.7%74.5%55.4%41.3%
AUS99.9%84.4%66.0%30.2%17.6%
KSA98.6%83.4%56.6%29.6%11.6%
IRN99.1%81.7%47.4%27.8%11.5%
KOR99.3%61.0%36.5%21.2%8.6%
UZB94.8%70.3%23.8%10.1%3.4%
JOR92.7%65.7%22.2%9.0%2.7%
UAE93.2%24.7%11.1%3.8%1.0%
IRQ94.8%35.7%13.8%4.1%0.9%
SYR79.9%33.9%9.1%1.9%0.4%
OMA76.1%34.3%8.8%1.8%0.3%
PLE74.7%33.5%8.4%1.7%0.3%
QAT66.2%20.3%5.6%1.1%<0.1%
VIE70.3%9.2%3.1%0.5%<0.1%
CHN59.1%16.9%3.3%0.5%<0.1%
BHR41.3%10.7%1.8%0.3%<0.1%
THA57.3%13.9%3.5%0.5%<0.1%
PRK44.0%11.5%1.8%0.3%<0.1%
IDN33.0%5.4%1.0%0.1%<0.1%
TJK39.4%3.8%0.3%<0.1%<0.1%
KUW24.3%4.9%0.5%<0.1%0.0%
KGZ31.0%5.6%0.7%<0.1%0.0%
SGP19.0%1.0%<0.1%0.0%0.0%
YEM12.0%0.4%<0.1%0.0%0.0%

* Estimated rating pending verification. Saudi Arabia’s rating includes a +100 host adjustment.

Model vs market: group winners

Average gap 5.2 percentage points across 20 teams. Sorted by largest disagreement.

TeamGroupModelMarketGap
JPNF95.2%74.4%+20.8 pp
QATF2.5%16.0%-13.5 pp
BHRB3.9%12.2%-8.3 pp
JORB41.7%33.5%+8.2 pp
UAEE23.3%16.1%+7.2 pp
KORE70.2%75.9%-5.7 pp
OMAA12.0%17.1%-5.1 pp
AUSD84.0%79.4%+4.6 pp
IDNF0.6%4.7%-4.1 pp
KSAA75.6%71.5%+4.1 pp
PLEA11.1%7.6%+3.5 pp
THAF1.7%4.9%-3.2 pp
YEME0.2%3.4%-3.2 pp
KUWA1.3%3.9%-2.6 pp
SGPD0.1%2.4%-2.3 pp
UZBB49.8%47.7%+2.1 pp
PRKB4.6%6.6%-2.0 pp
VIEE6.3%4.7%+1.6 pp
TJKD0.6%1.8%-1.2 pp
IRQD15.2%16.4%-1.2 pp

Positive gap: the model rates the team higher than the market. Polymarket (gamma API), midpoint of best bid and ask, de-margined, 2026-09-29. Skipped for thin trading: Group C (volume USD 419, 4 priced teams). Title market not used: USD 60 traded and most teams unpriced as of 2026-09-29.

Easiest routes

Mean rating of opponents met in the round of 16, quarter and semi, given the team gets there. Lower is easier. Teams with at least a 25% chance of reaching the knockouts.

#TeamR16QFSFIndex
1KSA1429158517061573
2IRN1462166716721600
3AUS1471154418061607
4JPN1562159117011618
5JOR1452174916931631
6UZB1444176416941634
7KOR1626164716621645
8BHR1583168316841650
9QAT1612163117131652
10PRK1583168916891654
11THA1626162917151657
12IDN1638162417081657
13PLE1520170217521658
14OMA1520170217551659
15SYR1542168317551660
16IRQ1627163117241661
17CHN1575167617411664
18KGZ1590167417381667
19TJK1639172716741680
20UAE1762161216991691
21VIE1759157417471693

Group strength

Group FMean 1522Top 1901
Group BMean 1502Top 1647
Group AMean 1497Top 1734
Group CMean 1480Top 1738
Group EMean 1477Top 1725
Group DMean 1445Top 1786

Most likely third-place combinations

Groups A, B, C, E14.4%
Groups A, B, E, F9.3%
Groups A, B, D, E8.5%
Groups A, C, E, F8.2%
Groups B, C, E, F7.6%
Groups A, B, C, F7.4%

Method

  1. Team strength is a World Football Elo rating (as of 2026-09-29, status: verified). The host gets +100.
  2. Each side scores Poisson goals with rate 1.28 × e±β·d, d = rating gap ÷ 400, β = 0.876. β is fitted so win-plus-half-draw matches Elo’s own win expectancy.
  3. Ratings are not treated as exact. Each simulated tournament draws every team’s strength from a normal distribution around its rating, with a standard deviation of 60 points for verified ratings and 110 for estimates. This stops the model overrating favourites.
  4. Groups are ranked by AFC tie-breakers: head-to-head points, goal difference, goals, re-applied to any subset, then overall goal difference and goals, then lots. Disciplinary points are not modelled.
  5. Knockout draws go to extra time (a third of the normal goal rate), then penalties, which are treated as close to a coin flip (±5 percentage points maximum tilt).
  6. 20,000 full-tournament simulations, seed 2027, generated 2026-09-29 22:00 UTC. Played results are fixed, not simulated.
  7. Market-implied probabilities are Polymarket bid/ask midpoints, de-margined. A market counts only after USD 1,000 has traded and quotes are within 10 points. Title odds blend 50/50 with the market once that market qualifies.